Sunday, August 19, 2012

Long Hair?

Artists through time have erroneously drawn Christ.  Today he has long flowing hair, and a pasty-white face.  While both are wrong, the following article I have edited goes into the long hair issue, and I hope it will help some understand that not all they see, even from good-intentioned Christians, it correct.  This article, while about 30 years old, is as valid as when it was written. 


Jesus Had Short Hair!


Several years ago musical groups such as the Beatles presented to society a hair style that was new to our generation. Soon long-haired young men began to appear on our streets. The hippie movement adopted this hair style, as did the Jesus freaks and other religious cults.
Soon many men and boys who are not hippies, Jesus freaks, religious cultists, or revolutionaries adopted these hair styles.
When protests began to come from parts of the Christian world, the advocates of these newer hair styles replied that they saw nothing wrong with men wearing long hair since Jesus Himself had long hair. They referred to paintings of Christ which picture Him with long flowing hair. This sent the older generation and some Christian leaders hurrying to the Bible and history books to find if, for a fact, Jesus did have long hair. This is dedicated to the task of revealing such a study.

I. GOD IS CONCERNED ABOUT OUR APPAREL, HAIR STYLES, ETC.


That He is concerned about our apparel is found in Proverbs 7:10,
And, behold, there met him a woman with the attire of an harlot, and subtil of heart.
Notice the words, "attire of an harlot." There is a wicked philosophy being spread abroad by some Christians that God is not interested in our attire. This philosophy tells us that God looks on the heart and we are not to judge by the outward appearance. The embracers of this philosophy use it to justify inappropriate dress, long hair, mini-skirts, etc. They obviously ignore such passages as Matthew 5:16 where our Lord admonishes us,
Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in Heaven.
They seem to believe that God is not concerned about what the Christian wears. This is not true. Proverbs 7:10 shows us that there is such a thing as the "attire of an harlot." Now what that attire is, is not the issue at this point. The issue is that God is interested in what the Christian wears. Consequently, the Bible does teach us concerning the outside as well as the inside.
In I Timothy 2:9 the Apostle Paul admonishes Timothy to exhort women to wear "modest apparel."
In like manner also, that women adorn themselves in modest apparel, with shamefacedness and sobriety; not with broided hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly array.
In Deuteronomy 22:5 we find God exhorting the Jewish men and ladies concerning their clothing.
The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman's garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the Lord thy God.
In I Peter 3:3 God shows an interest in the outward as He discusses women's hair styles, jewelry, and clothing.
Whose adorning let it not be that outward adorning of plaiting the hair, and of wearing of gold, or of putting on of apparel.
In I Corinthians 11:14 God discusses the hair style of men, and in verse 15 He speaks about the length of the ladies' hair.
Doth not even nature itself teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him? But if a woman have long hair, it is a glory to her: for her hair is given her for a covering.
Hence, the most casual observer of Scripture finds that God does manifest an interest in the outward.  He is interested in the way His people wear their hair, clothing, jewelry, etc. The argument that God is interested only in the inside makes a very spiritual-sounding cliché but it is simply not based on the Word of God.
Hair was very important to our Lord. He reminds us in Matthew 10:30 and in Luke 12:7 that the "very hairs of your head are all numbered," signifying the importance to Him of every aspect of our life and appearance.

II. THE BIBLE PLAINLY TEACHES THAT IT IS A "SHAME" FOR A MAN TO WEAR LONG HAIR.

I Corinthians 11:14 says, Doth not even nature itself teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him?
The Greek word for "shame" in this verse is translated elsewhere in the New Testament as "dishonor," "vile," "disgrace." In Romans 1:26 the same word is translated "vile."
For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature.
You will notice that these "vile affections" have to do with homosexuality. It is very interesting that as the trend toward long hair increases, the acceptance of homosexuality increases. This is not to say that long hair and homosexuality always go together, but it is to note the fact that both are on the rise in our generation. Several of the major denominations have now accepted homosexuals. In some cities there are churches for homosexuals pastored by avowed homosexuals. At least one major denomination has ordained a homosexual preacher and others are considering following suit.

III. THE BIBLE SAYS NOTHING ABOUT JESUS HAVING LONG HAIR.

The paintings of Christ are simply artists' conceptions and have no Scriptural authorization. At least one historian of His day described Him as being a tall man with chestnut-colored hair, parted in the middle, with short hair which turned up at the end. In the book, THE MODERN STUDENT'S USE OF CHRIST by Irving Vollmer, published by Fleming H. Revell, the author says,
Archeologists object to the conventional pictures of Christ because they are not true to history.
A German painter, L. Fahrenkrog, says,
Christ certainly never wore a beard, and His hair was beyond a doubt closely cut.
For this we have historical proof. The oldest representations going back to the first Christian centuries and found chiefly in the catacombs of Rome all pictured Him without a beard. All the pictures of Christ down to the beginning of the first century and even later are of this kind. Students of the first century and Roman history are aware of the fact that the time of Christ was characterized by short hair for men. This author has seen many coins and statues which bear the likenesses of emperors who reigned during and after the time of Christ. Such likenesses reveal that the Ceasars and other rulers and emperors had short hair, and of course, the subjects followed the example set by the emperor. The plain simple truth is that during the life of Christ, short hair was the acceptable style. That Jesus wore the conventional style of His day is proved by the fact that Judas had to kiss Him to point Him out to the soldiers. Had Jesus been somewhat different, as a long-haired freak, Judas could have simply told the soldiers that Jesus was the One with the long hair. This, of course, is not true, as Judas had to place a kiss on Him in order to identify Him.

IV. JESUS WAS NOT A NAZARITE.

Since it is generally believed that a Nazarite has to let his hair grow long, and since Jesus was from Nazareth, there are many who mistakenly identify Him as a Nazarite. There is no such Scriptural evidence. Jesus was a "Nazarene" because He was from Nazareth, but He was not a "Nazarite," and He did not take the Nazarite vow. A Nazarite could not eat grapes or drink grape juice or eat anything made of the vine.
Numbers 6:24 says, Speak unto the children of Israel, and say unto them, When either man or woman shall separate themselves to vow a vow of a Nazarite, to separate themselves unto the Lord: He shall separate himself from wine and strong drink, and shall drink no vinegar of wine, or vinegar of strong drink, neither shall he drink any liquor of grapes, nor eat moist grapes, or dried. All the days of his separation shall he eat nothing that is made of the vine tree, from the kernels even to the husk.
Hence, our Lord could not have been a Nazarite. Observe the last Passover in Luke 22:14-18, And when the hour was come, He sat down, and the twelve apostles with Him. And He said unto them, With desire I have desired to eat this passover with you before I suffer: For I say unto you, I will not any more eat thereof, until it be fulfilled in the kingdom of God. And He took the cup, and gave thanks, and said, Take this, and divide it among yourselves: For I say unto you I will not drink of the fruit of the vine, until the kingdom of God shall come.
The Passover was characterized by the fruit of the vine, and as a Nazarite our Lord would not have been allowed to partake of the Passover.
He also partook of the fruit of the vine when He instituted the Lord's Supper. Luke 22:19,20 says, And He took bread, and gave thanks, and brake it, and gave unto them, saying, This is My body which is given for you: this do in remembrance of Me. Likewise also the cup after supper, saying, This cup is the new testament in My blood, which is shed for you.
Likewise a Nazarite could not touch a dead body. Numbers 6:6,  All the days that he separateth himself unto the Lord he shall come at no dead body.
When our Lord raised the daughter of Jairus in Mark 5:41, the Bible says, And He took the damsel by the hand, and said unto her, Talitha cumi; which is, being interpreted, Damsel, I say unto thee, arise.
Then He also touched the bier which contained a dead man's body in Luke 7:12-15.  Now when He came nigh to the gate of the city, behold, there was a dead man carried out, the only son of his mother, and she was a widow: and much people of the city was with her. And when the Lord saw her, He had compassion on her, and said unto her, Weep not. And He came and touched the bier: and they that bare him stood still. And He said, Young man, I say unto thee, Arise. And he that was dead sat up, and began to speak. And He delivered him to his mother.
Since the Nazarite could not touch the fruit of the vine or touch a dead body, and since our Lord did both, we must arrive at the definite conclusion that He was not a Nazarite.

V. IF JESUS HAD BEEN A NAZARITE, HE STILL WOULD NOT NECESSARILY HAVE HAD LONG HAIR.

The Nazarite vow was taken for only a short period of time. The Bible says it was just for "days." In Numbers 6:5,6, and 13 we read, All the days of the vow of his separation there shall no razor come upon his head: until the days be fulfilled, in the which he separateth himself unto the Lord, he shall be holy, and shall let the locks of the hair of his head grow. All the days that he separateth himself unto the Lord he shall come at no dead body. And this is the law of the Nazarite, when the days of his separation are fulfilled: he shall be brought unto the door of the tabernacle of the congregation.
After these "days" were over the Nazarite was to shave his head. Numbers 6:18 says,
And the Nazarite shall shave the head of his separation at the door of the tabernacle of the congregation, and shall take the hair of the head of his separation, and put it in the fire which is under the sacrifice of the peace-offerings.
So it is obvious that the Nazarite was as likely to be bald-headed as he was to have long hair. Of course, this argument is needless as our Lord was not a Nazarite.

VI. ABSALOM WAS BOTH REBELLIOUS AND LONG-HAIRED.

The only long-haired person other than a Nazarite mentioned in the Bible was Absalom, a son of David. It was he who rebelled against his father. It was he who started a revolution. It is worth noting that even in Bible days rebellion, revolution, disobedience to parents, and long hair were associated.
Now what should the Christian's attitude be concerning male hair styles? First, we men should follow the admonition of the Scripture and have short hair. It should be short enough so as to be obviously contradictory to the revolutionary symbol. Many Christians allow their hair to become longer in an effort not to be identified as believers. Why shouldn't a Christian be just as proud of his identity with the Word of God as the hippie is to identify himself with revolution? Men, let us wear our short hair with pride as a symbol of our belief in the Bible and its Christ.
Romans 12:2, And be not conformed (fashioned) to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God.

Tuesday, August 7, 2012

The Genesis "Myth"

It was recently suggested to me that the OT book of Genesis was a myth, one provided to those before us to help them wrap their heads around reality and accept their place in the universe.  As such, I here are some thoughts on the "metaphorical" or mythological book of Genesis.

In the beginning...
Genesis 1:1-3, "In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. And God said, Let there be light: and there was light."

 Genesis 1:1 is the underpinning of the whole Bible.  If you cannot believe Genesis 1:1, you cannot accept the Bible.  It also provides more.  "In the beginning Elohim created the heaven and the earth".  Elohim is the first clue for the trinity.  Elohim is God in Hebrew, but it is plural.  This verse shows us the trinity was involved.  We see the Spirit moving on the waters.  We see the Father speaking the world into existance, and from John we know that Jesus is the Word who created it all.  Pretty cool. 

Creation Week
For those who believe somehow that the "days" are not literal 24-hour periods and that evolution is a creation of God, lets look at the order given for creation:

Day 1, Let light be
Day 2, Stretching of space
Day 3, Land of vegetation
Day 4, Sun, moon, and stars
Day 5, Sea, animals, and birds
Day 6, Land animals and mankind
Day 7, The Sabbath - rest

So, in the long-day model, the sun was created thousands/millions of years after plants.  Come on, isn't God smarter than that?

About Those Trees...
Genesis 2:9, "And out of the ground made the LORD God to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food; the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil."

First, God allowed to grow, not created the trees.  That is a new thought for some, but the really interesting "fingerprint" of God in Genesis is the text from Genesis 1:29-2:9.  This section of text in the Hebrew contains the name of every tree in the Bible, all 25.  As the Hebrew scholar said, "with God there are no coincidences".

Genealogies Are Inspired, Too
Genesis 5 lists the first 12 generations, but these names are not interpreted.  However, if one digs into the Hebrew roots the results are quite interesting. 

Adam:  (adomah) "man"
Seth:  "appointed" (Genesis 4:25)
Enosh:  (from root anash, "to be incurable") "mortal", "frail", "miserable"
Kenan:  "sorrow,", "dirge", "elegy"
Mahalal'el:  "the Blessed God' (mahalal) "blessed", El - the name for God
Jared:  (from the verb yaradh) "shall come down"
Enoch:  "commencement" or "teaching"
Methusaleh:  "his death shall bring", muth, a root that means "death"; shalach means "bring" or "send forth"
Lamech:  "despairing" (from which we get "lament" or "lamentation")
Noah:  (derived from nacham) "comfort" or "rest" (Genesis 5:29)

Strung together, you get the following message, "Man [is] appointed mortal sorrow; [but] the blessed God shall come down teaching [that His] death shall bring [the] despairing rest."

Lessons - a summary of the New Testament Gospel hidden in the first book of the Old Testament.  We know that "all scripture is given by inspiration", so is there by design.  It also shows that God's plan of redemption was laid at the foundation of the world, and had been planned from before. 

About Evolution
Recent advances in microbiology and the complexity of the cell have really turned evolutionists on their ear.  Michael Behe's book "Darwin's Black Box" is one of many eye-openers.  Also, the laws of Thermodynamics, which are explained in the Bible, interestingly, also deny evolution.  As the second law of Thermodynamics gives us the law of entropy, or that all things wind down, it is interesting to Christians to note that at one point God will end entropy.  Romans 8:21, "Because the creature itself also shall be delivered from the bondage of corruption into the glorious liberty of the children of God."

In summary I do not consider any part of Genesis a myth, or anything other than God's Word.  The above should help others along this path, and please understand this is just a bit from what we can learn from Genesis.  There is soooo much more.  Truly one of my favorite books.