Thoughts On Speaking In
Tongues
(Greatly expanded on 3/10/19)
A subject that
has come up a lot lately has been the Holy Spirit in relation to how Assembly
of God, Pentecostal and Charismatic believers take him. While varied, their beliefs, all tend toward focusing on pushing grace to the side and
accentuating the gifts of the Holy Spirit.
Cessation
This is not a
discussion on cessation. For those who
do not know what cessation is, there is much confusion regarding what it
means. It is tied to I Corinthian
13:8-10, “Charity never faileth: but
whether there be prophecies,
they shall fail; whether there be
tongues, they shall cease; whether there be knowledge, it shall vanish away. For we know in part, and we prophesy in part. But when that which is perfect is come, then
that which is in part shall be done away.”
In its purest
sense, those who believe in modern spiritual gifts are not cessationists. Cessationists believe the apostolic gifts
have ceased: tongues, interpretation of
tongues, healing, and prophecy tied to knowing the future. What is left are the gifts of grace, teaching/preaching,
and exhortation.
Acts
In college I had a wonderful Bible teacher, Dr. Mark Minnick, who managed to open God's word in a way I had never seen, and still today does that as a pastor at Mt. Calvary Baptist in Greenville, SC. To help others understand the Biblical take on Acts, I shall attempt to write out my class notes in a manageable way that conveys the logic of the findings. Yes, after all these years I do wish I had done a better job of taking notes. Age brings wisdom with it.
Acts 2 brings us Pentecost, an event looked at differently by many. Here is an outline of the Pentecost experience:
In college I had a wonderful Bible teacher, Dr. Mark Minnick, who managed to open God's word in a way I had never seen, and still today does that as a pastor at Mt. Calvary Baptist in Greenville, SC. To help others understand the Biblical take on Acts, I shall attempt to write out my class notes in a manageable way that conveys the logic of the findings. Yes, after all these years I do wish I had done a better job of taking notes. Age brings wisdom with it.
Acts 2 brings us Pentecost, an event looked at differently by many. Here is an outline of the Pentecost experience:
1.
Of
the 120
a.
Sound
of a great wind
b.
Fire
c.
Tongues
i. Verse 4 - Greek glossais, or English glossolalia, tongue speaking
ii. Verse 6 - language = dialecto or dialect
iii. Verses 9-10 - lists 15 distinct regions
or countries these people came from. These dialects were at least 11
different languages.
iv. Verse 11 - tongues = glossais
v. Glossais used in verses 4 & 11
vi. Dialecto used in verses 6 & 8
vii. Tongues were known foreign languages
2.
Of
the 3,000
a.
No
wind, fire or tongues
Throughout Acts
one finds many commonalities. Dr. Minnick calls these a Fourfold Pattern:
1.
There
were Jews present
2.
There
were apostles present
3.
Tongues
were a foreign language
4.
There
were people saved
In every case of
tongues or any spiritual gift in Acts, these four principles hold. Now,
we know God weaves truth and patterns throughout the Bible. By showing us
consistently that this fourfold pattern exists and is always accurate through
Acts, we see something that should work for us today.
We can look at
the Bible and easily see why tongues have ceased, but if we stretch it to
assume they may not have, their use should conform to the rules above.
Nothing in the Bible contradicts them, and with a little digging you will
see that no tongues usage today has anything to do with the Bible model.
There is a
practice called The Law of First Mention in hermeneutics. This really just means
it is the law of the first use. The law was built to fulfill Timothy's command
to rightly divide the word of truth, and not allow people to twist scripture. I
bring this up as the Fourfold Pattern above does indeed come from this
practice. All of Acts follows this pattern, so to take subsequent tongues mentioned
later in the Bible and try to make it fit outside of its original meaning is
just twisting scripture.
One of the key arguments thrown up is based on the practice of the tongues being a ministry gift, which is what they claim Acts was, or a mark of the baptism of the Holy Spirit. In 1 Corinthians 12:13 Paul tell us, "For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit." You can comb your Bible carefully and you will find we are told to be filled with the Holy Spirit, but never baptized.
These verses prove that a believer has the Holy Spirit. Acts 2:38-39, "Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost. For the promise is unto you, and to your children, and to all that are afar off, even as many as the Lord our God shall call."
It says everyone will receive the gift of the Holy Ghost at salvation, which is what Christ promised us. The word ‘baptize’, however, is the Greek word baptizo, and is referring to the immersion kind in water, not in the spirit. To claim otherwise is to twist scripture. Anyone who has dealt with sprinkling should know this word and its meaning well. As a side thought, notice who's name you are to be baptized in. Have you ever heard a pastor do that? Just curious...
Acts 2:4 is also often twisted, "And they were all filled with the Holy Ghost, and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance." As stated above these are known languages and follow the Fourfold Pattern. To claim believers today should achieve the same thing upon salvation is to take what happened at Pentecost out of context for a spurious belief.
One of the key arguments thrown up is based on the practice of the tongues being a ministry gift, which is what they claim Acts was, or a mark of the baptism of the Holy Spirit. In 1 Corinthians 12:13 Paul tell us, "For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit." You can comb your Bible carefully and you will find we are told to be filled with the Holy Spirit, but never baptized.
These verses prove that a believer has the Holy Spirit. Acts 2:38-39, "Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost. For the promise is unto you, and to your children, and to all that are afar off, even as many as the Lord our God shall call."
It says everyone will receive the gift of the Holy Ghost at salvation, which is what Christ promised us. The word ‘baptize’, however, is the Greek word baptizo, and is referring to the immersion kind in water, not in the spirit. To claim otherwise is to twist scripture. Anyone who has dealt with sprinkling should know this word and its meaning well. As a side thought, notice who's name you are to be baptized in. Have you ever heard a pastor do that? Just curious...
Acts 2:4 is also often twisted, "And they were all filled with the Holy Ghost, and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance." As stated above these are known languages and follow the Fourfold Pattern. To claim believers today should achieve the same thing upon salvation is to take what happened at Pentecost out of context for a spurious belief.
The Church in Corinth
Ponder this – tongues
are not unique to Christianity. The fact pagans can speak in tongues and do it
just as convincingly as any professing Charismatic Christian is proof that someone
speaking in tongues does not necessarily mean they are getting that ability from
God. Pagans do it too. It simply cannot be an indication of God’s hand on that
person.
Tongues can be
practiced in an ignorant, ungodly way. This is what was going on in the church
in Corinth. The church in Corinth was an absolute mess through rampant abuse of
the spiritual gifts. They were abusing the gifts in every imaginable way and combined
with an unimaginable morality going on in that church.
Paul was writing
to correct this. Tongues can be practiced in an ungodly way. It can be done in such a way that it brings
attention to the person speaking in tongues, rather than glorifying Christ and
edifying the church. That is what was going on in the church at Corinth.
I Corinthians
14:27,28, “If any man speak in an unknown
tongue, let it be by two, or at the most by three, and that by course; and let
one interpret.
But if there be no interpreter, let him
keep silence in the church; and let him speak to himself, and to God.”
Paul made it
clear that if speaking in tongues is done in public in corporate worship, an
interpreter must always be present and he must always interpret. So if you are
in a church and there is a group of people speaking in tongues all at once with
no one interpreting, that is well outside of biblical parameters. That is not
of God. Paul clearly states it must be done by two or at the most three, each
in turn and one must always interpret. And if that is not what’s going on, then
that is outside of biblical parameters, it is not of God.
As a Christian
we believe the Bible. We cannot simply
erase what Paul wrote. You may be
starting to see why there is an issue with the use of tongues in churches
today, not just at Corinth. You also can
see why we believe the gift has ceased anyway and is no longer in operation.
As pointed out
on the note on Acts 2:4 above, it is false that all believers should or must speak
in tongues. Some churches teach that if you are saved, your salvation will be
evidenced by you speaking in tongues. And if you do not speak in tongues then are
not saved. This belief is patently unbiblical.
I Corinthian
12:29, “Are all apostles? are all
prophets? are all teachers? are all workers of miracles?”
Here the Apostle
Paul asks a series of rhetorical questions. He says, “All are not workers of
miracles, are they? All do not teach, do they? All do not speak in tongues, do
they? And clearly the implied answer to these rhetorical questions is no…no
they do not.
We can no more
say that every Christian should speak in tongues than we could say that every
Christian should have the gift of teaching, or every Christian should have the
gift of mercy, or every Christian should have the gift of preaching (prophecy).
Every Christian does not have every spiritual gift. The Holy Spirit distributes
the gifts among the body as He wills to do so (I Corinthians, pretty much the
whole Chapter 12). So this is patently unbiblical.
Isaiah 28:11, “For with stammering lips and another tongue
will he speak to this people.” This
verse is typical of many OT prophecies.
It has an immediate meaning carrying judgment to those not following
God, but it also has a future look of judgment.
While some may say it does not speak of tongues, Paul would disagree as
he quotes from it.
I Corinthians
14:21-22, “In the law it is written, With
men of other tongues and other lips will I speak unto this people; and yet for
all that will they not hear me, saith the Lord.
Wherefore tongues are for a sign, not to
them that believe, but to them that believe not: but prophesying serveth not
for them that believe not, but for them which believe.”
Remember our
Fourfold Pattern from Acts? Someone was
always saved when tongues were spoken.
Preaching that brings souls to Christ does so through conviction of sin,
usually helping the sinner see their soul in the light of eternal judgment for
their sins. So, tongues were a sign of
judgment. The Jews had hard hearts, and
just words would not work. They were a
sign, not to those who believed, but those who did not.
Acts 1:8, “But ye shall receive power, after that the
Holy Ghost is come upon you: and ye shall be witnesses unto me both in
Jerusalem, and in all Judaea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of
the earth.”
It is
interesting to me that the Great Commission was command, with split
fulfillment. We all know how the
apostles and disciples, and even modern missionaries travel the world to reach
the lost for Christ. However, consider
the day of Pentecost. When the apostles
stood up to preach they spoke every man in the language of those present. This was the world’s crossroad, with people
from every known language regularly trading and traveling. That day, they each hear the gospel in their
own language. Isaiah 28:11 was
fulfilled, and Acts 1:8 was also.
That day these
hardened Jews heard Isaiah 28:11 fulfilled, and knew this as a sign of
prophetic judgment. They knew Isaiah and
they believed it and had learned of its historical accuracy. There was no doubt in their minds what was
happening, but this preaching tied together the fact they had rejected their
Messiah and crucified him. And they knew
he rose from the dead. Over 500 accurate
witnesses. No doubt. Now judgment.
Many came to
know Christ that day. We cannot know
what all went through their hearts as they accepted Christ, but can only glory
in their decision. They were, however,
judged. That day God’s focus of
salvation shifted from the Jews to the Gentiles. You see this throughout Acts, and how God
even had to help Peter as he was quite racist or purist. He did not want to preach to the Gentiles. As the focus shifted to the Gentiles, you do
not see tongues used. This was a sign to
the Jews, knowing it tied to prophecy and OT scripture for them.
Today the Jews
are still under judgment. They are
waiting upon God to shift his focus back to them. Consider the gospel spread out from
Jerusalem. It left the Jews as it spread
to the Gentiles. For 2,000 years it has
been circling the globe, but if you are a map watcher it is moving back to the
middle east. Where are the biggest
revivals happening right now? Not in
Great Britain like they used to. Not in
America like they used to. No, they are
happening in Islamic countries. Whole
towns are leaving Allah for our saviour.
The Holy Spirit is alive and well and still reaching the lost. No tongues, just the gospel. I believe that as the Holy Spirit works back
to Jerusalem, it is another indication the Rapture is soon. Definitely listening for that trumpet!!!
Closing
I would
challenge Christians to go back to the Bible. We are never told
"feelings" get us to heaven, but faith. We have no evidence
from the Bible that "spirit filled" services are Biblical or of God.
If you look into it hard enough, Satan has been doing what modern
churches do for ages, but this has nothing to do with God. Please examine
your beliefs in the light of scripture, and let go of the feelings. Get back to holiness and Godliness.
Remember what the source of wisdom is - the fear of the Lord. Fear,
or full respect for his holiness and our sinful position, does not make one
jump up and down, but rather fall on their face repenting of their sins.
Very enlightening
ReplyDeleteHi,
ReplyDeleteI was a bit perplexed by your side thought, "notice who's name you are to be baptized in. Have you ever heard a pastor do that? Just curious..." Are you suggesting that baptism be professed in the name of Jesus? Also are you asking if anyone has ever heard a pastor so do? Thanks.
Kree, I think we get so caught up in tradition that we hear baptisms in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit without them thinking about it. Since Peter, in dealing with Gentiles, baptised them in the name of Jesus, it was just a comment that I have never heard a pastor do that. Thank you for your comments, and I hope it helped.
DeleteThank you for clarifying that for me. I know Apostolic Pentecostals strictly baptize in Jesus's name only. My daughter was baptized in an indy baptist church and the pastor baptized in both Jesus name and Father, Son and Holy Ghost. My sister was also baptized that way in a pentecostal church. Apparently there are pastors who are willing to include the name of Jesus perhaps to be on the safe side ?
ReplyDeleteThank you again for your comment, Kree. I have never heard a pastor not baptize in the Trinity's name, but as you say safe may be wise. I don't believe there is anything unscriptural about it. I think it is just more important a new believer follow the Lord's command and be baptised to show their obedience to His word. Have a blessed day!
DeleteHello! I wanted to present a study that does not belong to me, but I accepted. Do you believe in biblical difference between these concepts of foreign language and strange language?
ReplyDeletein fact the Bible presents both, in different books, different events and different purposes.
1st Foreign Languages or Xenoglossia.
Xenoglossy (the xen Greek (o) = strange, alien + gloss (o) = language) consists in speaking a foreign language without having studied or learned, THAT be recorded in the book of Acts 2.4-8.
Here Luke describes the Descent of the Holy Spirit, as the fulfillment of the prophecy of Joel 3.28-32, Acts 2.16-20
The disciples spoke dialects (Dialektov - language or dialektos -Languages)
By direct action of the Holy Spirit on them, making them speak foreign languages as the Spirit gave them utterance.
The Hernandes Dias Lopes, Reverend Presbyterian) lectured very well to present the differences between the languages spoken in Acts of Spoken in Corinthians.
1 Languages in Acts were proclaimed, that is, his disciples spoke to men; since the tongues in 1 Corinthians were prayer, that is, the believers spoke to God. Accordingly, these languages were different in your address
2- The language in Acts were understood by the various linguistic groups of Jews who lived in Jerusalem, as in 1 Corinthians tongues were unintelligible and there was a need of an interpreter to translate them. Consequently, they were also different in character.
3 Languages in Acts were given to a specific group in a specific place at a specific time; while in 1 Corinthians tongues is a spiritual gift that continues to be given to some for his own edification and for church building.
4- The languages were dialects in Acts (2: 6,8), that is, languages spoken and understood by many people who were in Jerusalem, while in 1 Corinthians who spoke in tongues uttering mysteries and no one could understand (1 Cor 14 :2).
5- The languages in Acts do not need an interpreter, because each one heard them speaking in their own language, as in 1 Corinthians until the speaker does not understand what you say, unless you also have the gift of interpretation (1 Corinthians 14:13, 14).
6- The tongues in Acts is intended to proclaim God's greatness out, building others, as in 1 Corinthians, tongues should not be used in public, unless there interpreter. It was a gift of self edification (1 Cor 12: 2,3,19).
7- The languages spoken in Acts were spoken by those who were filled with the Holy Spirit as in 1 Corinthians is a spiritual gift granted not everyone, but only a few (1 Cor 12: 10,30)
8 Languages Acts are prophecy, proclaiming the virtues of God to men, whereas in 1 Corinthians are prayer, words of men to God
9 Languages in Acts was one of the evidence that the men were filled full of the Spirit, but in 1 Corinthians them has no connection with the fullness of the Holy Spirit. Corinthian Church believers spoke in tongues, but they were immature and carnal Christians.
The last word Paul has on the subject is: ... and do not forbid speaking in tongues (1 Corinthians 14:39) ""
Tammy.
Tammy, you are going to make me dig into Corinthians, and that goes far deeper than Acts. :-)
DeleteI have learned that many really don't care what the Bible teaches, but I'll dig a bit and put some more info up. Corinthians does not allow what people think it does, either.